Wednesday, 12 August 2015

SREEHUL EM ASSIGNMENT 1


 BRITISH CULTURAL STUDIES

Cultural Studies is very hard to define; it is not so much a discrete approach at all; it is rather a set of practices. According to Patrick Brantlinger it is not a tightly coherent unified movement with a fixed agenda; but a loosely coherent group of tendencies, issues and questions. Arising from the social turmoil of the 1960s, cultural studies is composed of elements of Marxism, post structuralism, post modernism, feminism, gender studies, anthropology, sociology, race and ethnic studies, film theory, post colonial studies and popular Culture studies. Those fields concentrate on social and cultural forces, that either create community or cause division and alienation. Drawing from Roland Barthes on the nature of literary language and, Claud Levi Strauss on anthropology, Cultural studies was influenced by both structuralism and post structuralism. Jacquess Derrida’s, deconstruction urged cultural critics to erase the boundaries between high and low culture, classic and popular literary text and literature and other cultural discourses; that may be seen as manifestations of same textuality. The discipline of psychology has also entered into the field of Cultural studies recently.
        
        A cultural Studies approach generally shares some of the goals such as 1) CS transcends the confine of a particular discipline such as literary criticism or history. CS is not necessarily about literature in the traditional sense or even about art. It cut across diverse social and political interest and address many of the struggles within the current scene. Another approach is that, cultural studies are politically engaged. Cultural critics see themselves as ‘oppositional’, not only within their own discipline but to many of the power structure of society at large. They question inequalities within power structures and seek to discover modest for restructuring relationship among dominant and minority discourses. Because meaning individual subjectivity are culturally constructed; they can thus reconstructed. Another one is that cultural studies denies the separation of ‘high’ and ‘low’ or elite or popular culture. Cultural critics try to transfer the term ‘culture’ to include mass culture whether popular folk or urban. Cultural critics argue that after the second World War the distinctions among high, low and mass culture collapsed.
BRITISH CULTURAL STUDIES

 Cultural studies in the beginning was concentrated in Britain, being the birth place of Cultural studies, the cultural studies from Britain is known as British Cultural studies. Even though the study of culture has no origins or single site of activity, however cultural studies as an institutionally located activity did have a birth place from where it got named. The formation of Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies at the University of Birmingham in UK denoted the institutionalization of cultural studies and its wide spread. British Cultural Studies emerged from the research done at the BCCCS, an interdisciplinary research centre established by Richard Hoggart and Stuart Hall at the University of Birmingham in 1964.
        What is practiced in Birmingham, Cultural studies seems to be changed a lot from its beginning, it appeared or evolved into a more generic term referring to a cross-disciplinary field. During the years of Birmingham Centre, people and institutions practiced in it carried its tradition. Now a days it is clear that Britain no more stand as the pioneer of Cultural studies. It is during the Thatcher years that Cultural studies in Britain witnessed its decay. During those years Britain is fragmented and left Great Britain, people migrating in the USA, Canada, Australia, France and India. As a result of it is the so called British cultural studies became fragmented and was exported to other English speaking locations, especially in USA, Australia and Canada. Now a day’s cultural studies seems to have their own independent national roots and origin. Different nations have their own way of institutionalizing cultural studies and formation.  
There are so many factors affected the development of British Cultural studies. The Second World War and its effects on British society and cultural values made the people to think about new Cultural Revolution, reorganizing those lost values and culture. From this decay of British cultural values that the emergence of British cultural studies took place. One of the factors which affected the development of British cultural studies is that British government at all level extended educational opportunities after the Second World War that is promoting adult education as a means of reconstruction. Another factor is that the influence of American popular culture on British traditional culture.  Mass produced American popular culture such as pop-music, Hollywood films and television programs displaced traditional popular culture.
Another factor is that the influence of philosophers and critics’, such as French thinkers as Roland Barthes, Louis Althusser and Michel Foucault offered British intellectuals new ways to frame the question of culture in new ways. Another reason is the emergence of New Left in Britain as response to Russia’s invasion of Hungary in1956, revived the Marxist critique of capitalism. From these developments that Richard Hoggart, Raymond Williams and E.P.Thompson focused on the question of ‘culture’ in their class-based society and wrote texts for the basis of BCS.
       Richard Hoggart, Raymond Williams, Stuart Hall, E.P.Thompson were the major contributors to British Cultural Studies or CS. Richard Hoggart, during his earlier times was a professor at University of Hull (1946-59), later joined the University of Birmingham and where he founded the CCCS, and he served as the director from 1964-68. In his work The Uses of Literacy (1957) through his earlier childhood experiences he shows the working class culture and values, and their attitude towards religion, politics, poverty, sex…etc. Through this work he also tries to portray the mass culture of the 1950s. Throughout this work he perpetuates a dichotomy between the ‘good’ culture of working class communities of the past and the ‘bad’ mass culture of the present.

Another important person in the development of British cultural studies was Raymond Williams (1921-88). He was a leading literary intellectual in Britain in the 20th century. He was one of the founding figures of cultural studies. It was during professor at Cambridge University that he was taught Stuart Hall and Terry Eagleton, who would themselves became important figures in literacy and cultural studies. In Marxism and Literature (1977) Williams seeks to criticize and develop both Marxism and Literary theory, questioning the dogmas of Marxist cultural theory and problematic concepts in literary theory to form a new advanced theory to overcome this crisis- Cultural Materialism. The book reveals the power and practices in which the bourgeoisie succeeded in attributing its own cultural, literary, social, and economic standards. Through this work Williams criticizing the Marxist notion about culture, he emphasize that Marxist theory did not successfully question the bourgeois notion of culture. The bourgeois trapped the cultural production within the superstructure, conceiving it as the mere reflection of the economic activities that constitute the base. Here Williams suggest that Marxist theory should change the notion of culture as a hierarchical model, he also suggest that both base and superstructure should be treated in a mutually interacting entities. Raymond Williams offers us a broad definition of culture; one that includes ‘high’ culture as well as ‘mass’ culture, and suggest that we have to take holistic approach to the study of culture.
Another notable figure in the field of BCS is E.P.Thompson (1924-93), a British historian whose work The Making of the English Working Class (1963), demonstrates the emergence of the British working class. He outlines the political and the cultural formation of the English working class influenced by the French Revolution, Industrial revolution…etc. Thompson argues that class is an historical phenomenon, which we cannot understand it as a structure. He further emphasizes that to understand ‘class’ we must see it as a social and cultural formation arising from the process of over a time period. According to him culture must be understood in terms of the experience of the winners and losers in the struggles to fix meaning in society.

Another important figure in the field of BCS was Stuart Hall (1932), the most prominent and influential theorist of British cultural studies and leftish intellectual. He was deeply involved in the New Left revisionist engagement with Marxism during the 1950s and 1960s. In the 1990s Hall took up issues connected with racial and cultural identities, “the politics of difference:, and the African diasporas. When Thatcher was gained power in Britain, Hall became increasingly discouraged about the prospects of leftist politics in Britain and turned his attention after 1998 to contemporary art, video and urban art forms. He was more connected with communication methods and models. In his important article ‘Encoding and Decoding in Television Discourse’ is a turning point in cultural studies and communication. Through this work Hall makes a conclusive break with the hitherto dominant American communication models with the notion of the audience as passive consumers of mass culture.  In this work he describes how media messages are produced, circulated and consumed, proposing a new theory of communication. Hall argued that the meaning is not fixed/ determined by the sender, the message is never transparent and the audience is not a passive recipient of meaning. He further adds that there is a ‘lack of fit’ between the moment of the production of the message (encoding) and the moment of  its reception (decoding). The meaning of text relies between its producer and reader. The producer (encoder) framed ( or encoded) meaning in a certain way, while the reader( decoder) decodes it differently according to his/her personal background, social situations, and interpretations. The message cannot be said to be understood unless it produces the intended reaction within the audience. His notion of meaning of a message is strictly related to its cultural background or the surrounding it its produced is relevant in the construction of studies regarding Culture.
Another notable figure who contributed to the BCS is Catherine Belsey, a British literary critic. An interview with Catherine Belsey by Paul Bowman entitled ‘From Cultural Studies to Cultural Criticism?’ describes how cultural studies turned towards cultural criticism. In this interview she mentions about the development of British Cultural studies, tracing its origin from BCCCS, gives details about the situations in which cultural studies emerged as an institution, how it is changed now a days from the so called ‘great tradition’. She emphasize through her interview that institutionalization of cultural studies made change to it and cultural studies moved away from theory also.
 Like Raymond Williams, Stuart Hall, Richard Hoggart, E.P.Thompson many scholars had contributed to the development of cultural studies. Even though it was originated in England against American civilized culture, it became spread all over the world as a unique discipline.



BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alasuutari, Perti (1995). Researching Culture: Qualitative Method and Culture Studies. London: Sage Publications.
Baker, Chris (2002). Making Sense of Cultural studies-Central Problems and Critical Debates. London: sage publications
Gressberg, Lawrence (2010). Cultural Studies in the Future Tense. Orient Blackswan Private ltd.
Turner, Graeme (2005).British Cultural Studies-An Introduction. Taylor&Franscis.pdf.




















No comments: