British Cultural
Studies
Aleena
Abraham
Culture is not a simple term as it
seems to be. There are a number of definitions to culture. Culture can be seen
as a way of life including activities like brushing teeth to something like
following table manners. Cultural
Studies is a discipline that analyses culture theoretically, politically and
empirically. It was developed by British Academics in the late 1950’s, 60’s and
70’s. Cultural Studies can be interdisciplinary and antidisciplinary. Studying
or examining culture as a way of life is the key concern for Cultural studies
practitioners.
A critical development in the field of
Cultural studies was made when Richard Hoggart used the term in 1964. A British
style of cultural studies was developed in the 1960’s and 70’s. It was
articulated and practiced at Birmingham Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies
(BCCCS). The aim of British Cultural Studies was to distinguish ‘popular’
culture from ‘mass’ or ‘consumerist’ culture. A distinction was needed because
British and European traditions privileged high art over popular or low art.
The
pioneers of Cultural studies were three working class intellectuals namely
Richard Hoggart, Raymond Williams and E.P Thomson. A number of French
intellectuals including Roland Barthes, Claude Levi Strauss, Louis Althusser,
Michel Foucault, Pierre Bourdieu, and Michel de Certeau, pioneered structuralist
and post structuralist methodologies for investigating culture. British
cultural studies made major contributions to literary and historical theory,
ethnography of urban sub-cultures, popular culture and media studies, women’s
studies, ethnic studies etc.
Marxism puts culture in the superstructure.
But according to Marxists the main human activity takes place in the base. So
if culture is put in the superstructure it lacks activity but in reality
culture is highly dependent on human activity. This gives rise to a
contradiction. Base shapes superstructure and superstructure maintains the base
and legitimizes it. Media presents the dominant or hegemonic culture as the
common idea by making it a commonsensical idea. Most of the times it is the
culture of the dominant class that is considered to be “cultured” or
acceptable. In that way culture is related to civilization as Raymond Williams
has portrayed in his book Marxism and Literature. Earlier times culture dealt
with animal culture or tissue culture but later it became the order of the
society.
Cultural
studies have no strict boundary and as a result everything that is real can be
seen as culture. Culture can be gender biased, minority biased, economically
biased, class biased, ageist etc. Cultural studies have no specific
methodology. British Cultural Studies developed during the Post War years. The
idea begins with Raymond Williams. Matthew Arnold in Culture and Anarchy (1869)
says that the society is heading towards anarchy and only culture can save it.
A lot of factors affected the development of
British Cultural Studies. Educational facilities were provided in Britain after
the Second World War and educating the adults was seen as a means of
reconstructing the society. Secondly mass produced American culture displaced
the traditional popular culture. Thirdly the ideas of French thinkers like
Roland Barthes, Althusser and Foucault gave new way to the question of culture.
Finally the New Left revived the Marxist Critique of capitalism.
Richard
Hoggart was one of the earlier analyzers of British Industrial working class
culture. In “The Uses of Literacy” (1958) Hoggart explores the relation between
working class culture and folk culture. The Birmingham Centre for Contemporary
Cultural Studies grew out of a shift in the mood and direction of British
social, aesthetic and cultural inquiry.
Raymond Williams’ “Culture and Society” (1958)
is one of the most important books in the development of British Cultural
Studies. He tries to understand culture by studying the relationship between
literature and politics. His notion of culture is largely untheorised. He says
that “Culture is one of the two or three most complicated words in the English
language”.
F. R Leavis in his Great Tradition says that
culture is not a leisure activity. Only Great Tradition can form mature
individuals. It is challenged by the tastes of the masses. Cultural capital in
a way means power. Williams’ conclusion to culture shows his contrary attitude
towards inclusiveness on one side and intellectual and social leadership on the
other side.
E.
P Thomson’s The Making of the English Working Class (1980) represents a
critical link between cultural theory and politics. He seeks to explain
cultural formation in terms of the progress of capitalism. He rejects the
notion of class domination. To him the working class is not merely determined
but is determining. He completely rejected the Leavisite idea of high and low
art. For Thompson everything contributes to the building and legitimation of
culture. During the 1970’s he was engaged in a debate concerning the relative
value of culturalism and structuralism.
Stuart
Hall asserts that British Cultural Studies is implicated in the politics and
postulates of Marxism. To him Cultural Studies exists by working on Marxism,
working against Marxism, working to develop Marxism etc. The theoretical
interests of Marxism and Cultural Studies never matched because Marxism fails
to address the key concerns of Cultural Studies. Hall notes Marxism remains
decidedly Eurocentric in its move from structuralist to Gramscian cultural
analysis. His idea of culture includes all that is mediated through media,
includes the dichotomy of high and low art, includes the practices of the
middle and working class, and the politics of all classes and social groups in
the society.
Graeme Turner sees culture as an
interdisciplinary field and not as a constellation of disciplines. But culture
cannot be seen just as an interdisciplinary field as it is also a set of
concepts that problematises the methods of traditional humanities. Every
reality can be seen as a culture because a meaning making process is involved
in every reality. British Cultural Studies was the first to address the problem
of meaning making and the need to understand human experiences known as
culture.
Catherine
Belsey in an interview with Paul Bowman talks about a shift from Cultural
Studies to Cultural Criticism. Cultural Criticism includes a wider range of materials
than Cultural Studies. The strength of Cultural Studies was its popularizing
impulse but now it is affected by the disadvantage of populism. She was
concerned about the institutionalisation of Cultural Studies. Cultural criticism
is the study of meanings. It breaks down the limitations of Cultural Studies
and embraces Cultural History. As she suggests “No discipline is forever”.
Every new discipline is established to solve the limitations of the already
existing disciplines. It is a continuing process and as a result of this every
moment a new disclipline is born to cope up with the limitations of the already
existing ones.
Bibliography
Turner, Graeme. British Cultural Studies An Introduction. Routledge Publishers, n.d.
Oswell, David. Culture and Society- An
Introduction to Cultural Studies. California:
Sage Publications, 2006.
Lewis, Jeff. Cultural
Studies: The Basics. New Delhi: SAGE publications , 2008.
Barker, Chris. Cultural Studies: Theory and
practice. 3rd Edition. New Delhi: SAGE publications, 2008.
No comments:
Post a Comment